Credibility of disability estimates from the 2011 population census in Poland

Elżbieta Gołata; Grażyna Dehnel

doi:10.21307/stattrans-2021-016

Credibility of disability estimates from the 2011 population census in Poland

Elżbieta Gołata Poznań University of Economics and Business. Department of Statistics, Poznań, Poland ORCID:https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5570-9576 , Grażyna Dehnel Poznań University of Economics and Business. Department of Statistics, Poznań, Poland ORCID:https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0072-9681 Statistics in Transition new series, vol. 22, 2021, 2, pages: 41-65 Published online: 4 June 2021 DOI 10.21307/stattrans-2021-016

586 Views 42 Downloads

ARTICLE

(English) PDF

ABSTRACT

The problem of disability is perceived as one of the most serious social issues faced by the contemporary society. The number of people with disability is consistently rising for a variety of reasons, including the aging of the population. Data on disability are collected through numerous statistical surveys, among which censuses are the most wide-scale ones. In the period between the 2002 and 2011 censuses (the last two censuses conducted in Poland), a 14% decrease in the number of people with disabilities was observed. However, it should be emphasised that significant modifications were introduced to the methodology of the last census. Population census 2011 was the first census in Poland combing administrative data sources and the survey sampling method. The main objective of the study is to assess the quality of estimates relating to the number of disabled persons, obtained on the basis of the 2011 census data. It is a comparative study aimed at identifying the similarities and discrepancies between the estimates, and determining the size and source of these discrepancies. The analysis takes into account such aspects as the measurement methods, the definitions and criteria of disability, the voluntary nature of the question, and the quality of the information on disability obtained from various sources.

KEYWORDS

disability, health condition, demographic processes, quality of a statistical survey

JEL

I15, I18, J11, J14

REFERENCES

Altman, B. M., (2016). International Measurement of Disability (B. M. Altman, ed.). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28498-9.

Altman, B. M., Meltzer, H., (2016). Developing Tools to Identify Environmental Factors as Context for Disability: A Theoretical Perspective. In International Measurment of Disability, pp. 183–206, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28498-9_12.

Antczak, R., Grabowska, I., & Polańska, Z., (2018). Podstawy i źródła danych statystyki osób niepełnosprawnych. Wiadomości Statystyczne, (2), pp. 21–43, Retrieved from http://stat.gov.pl/czasopisma/wiadomosci-statystyczne/archiwum/wiadomoscistatystyczne- nr-22018-681,7,38.html.

Bogaert, P., Van Oyen, H., Beluche, I., Cambois, E., & Robine, J. M., (2018). The use of the global activity limitation Indicator and healthy life years by member states and the European Commission. Archives of Public Health, 76(1), pp. 1–7, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-018-0279-z.

Cambois, E., Jagger, C., Nusselder, W., Van Oyen, H., & Robine, J.-M., (2016). International Comparisons of Disability Prevalence Estimates: Impact of Accounting or Not Accounting for the Institutionalized Population. In International Measurement of Disability, pp. 207–229 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28498-9_13.

Crialesi, R., De Palma, E., & Battisti, A., (2016). Building a “Module on Child Functioning and Disability.” In International Measurement of Disability, pp. 151– 165, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28498-9_10.

Dehnel, G., Klimanek, T., (2016). Disa,bility in the national censuses of 2002 and 2011– a comparison of information scope. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis Folia Oeconomica, 5(325), pp. 127–141, https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6018.325.10.

Dz.U. 2016 poz. 2046, (2016). Obwieszczenie Marszałka Sejmu RP z dnia 14 listopada 2016 r. w sprawie ogłoszenia jednolitego tekstu ustawy o rehabilitacji zawodowej i społecznej oraz zatrudnianiu osób niepełnosprawnych. Dziennik Ustaw, poz. 2046, Retrieved from http://prawo.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/download.xsp/WDU20160002046/T/D2016204 6L.pdf.

Dz.U. 2017 poz. 1383, (2017). Obwieszczenie Marszałka Sejmu Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej z dnia 7 lipca 2017 r. w sprawie ogłoszenia jednolitego tekstu ustawy o emeryturach i rentach z Funduszu Ubezpieczeń Społecznych, Dziennik Ustaw.

Dz.U. Nr 47 poz. 277, (2010). Ustawa z dnia 4 marca 2010 r. o narodowym spisie powszechnym ludności i mieszkań w 2011 r., Dziennik Ustaw.

Ehlis, (2015). European Health and Life Expectancy Information System, Retrieved from https://www.bridge-health.eu/sites/default/files/BRIDGE Health EHLEIS_SHORT.pdf.

Fihel, A., (2011). Płec´ a trwanie z˙ycia : analiza demograficzna. Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego : Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydział Nauk Ekonomicznych.

GUS, (2011a). Kwestionariusz NSP 2011. Badanie reprezentacyjne. Ludność, Retrieved from ttps://stat.gov.pl/download/gfx/portalinformacyjny/pl/defaultstronaopisowa/5781 /1/1/nsp_2011_badanie_reprez_ludnosc_wykaz_pytan.pdf.

GUS, (2011b). Stan zdrowia ludnosci Polski w 2009 r. (N. Koehne, B. Lednicki, M. Piekarzewska, R. Wieczorkowski, & A. Zajenkowska-Kozłowska, eds.), Retrieved from https://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/zdrowie/zdrowie/stan-zdrowia-ludnoscipolski- w-2009-r,6,5.html.

GUS, (2012). Osoby niepełnosprawne na rynku pracy w 2011 r., Retrieved from https://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/rynek-pracy/pracujacy-bezrobotni-biernizawodowo- wg-bael/osoby-niepelnosprawne-na-rynku-pracy-w-2011-r-,24,1.html.

GUS, (2013a). Ludność, stan i struktura demograficzno-społeczna, Narodowy Spis Powszechny Ludności i Mieszkań 2011, Warszawa.

GUS, (2013b). Ludność i gospodarstwa domowe. Stan i struktura społecznoekonomiczna. Część I. Ludność – NSP 2011, Retrieved from https://stat.gov.pl/spisypowszechne/ nsp-2011/nsp-2011-wyniki/ludnosc-i-gospodarstwa-domowe-stan-istruktura- spoleczno-ekonomiczna-czesc-i-ludnosc-nsp-2011,11,1.html.

GUS, (2016). Stan zdrowia Ludnosci Polski w 2014 r. (M. Piekarzewska, R. Wieczorkowski, & A. Zajenkowska-Kozłowska, eds.), Retrieved from https://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/zdrowie/zdrowie/stanzdrowia- ludnosci-polski-w-2014-r- ,6,6.html?pdf=1#%5B%7B%22num%22%3A1%2C%22gen%22%3A0%7D%2C%7 B%22name%22%3A%22XYZ%22%7D%2C0%2C841.89%2Cnull%5D.

Loeb, M., (2016a). Development of Disability Measures for Surveys: The Washington Group Extended Set on Functioning. In International Measurement of Disability, pp. 97–122, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28498-9_7.

Loeb, M., (2016b). International Census/Survey Data and the Short Set of Disability Questions Developed by the Washington Group on Disability Statistics, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28498-9_15.

Madans, J., Mont, D., & Loeb, M., (2015). Comments on Sabariego et al. Measuring Disability: Comparing the Impact of Two Data Collection Approaches on Disability Rates. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 2015, 12, pp. 10329–10351.

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13(1), p. 65, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13010065

Meltzer, H., (2016). The Challenges of Conducting National Surveys of Disability Among Children. In International Measurement of Disability, pp. 137–149, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28498-9_9.

Molden, T. H., Tossebro, J., (2010). Measuring disability in survey research: Comparing current measurements within one data set. Alter, 4(3), 174–189, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alter.2010.05.003

Mont, D. (2007). Measuring Disability Prevalence. Social Protection, World Bank, (0706), pp. 1–54.

Sabariego, C., Oberhauser, C., Posarac, A., Bickenbach, J., Kostanjsek, N., Chatterji, S.,Cieza, A., (2015). Measuring disability: Comparing the impact of two data collection approaches on disability rates. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12(9), pp. 10329–10351, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120910329.

Slany, K., (2014). Osoby niepełnosprawne w świetle Narodowego Spisu Powszechnego Ludności i Mieszkań z 2011 r. – wybrane aspekty. Niepełnosprawność, (11), pp. 44– 62, Retrieved from http://www.pfron.org.pl/download/5/503/04-KrystynaSlany.pdf.

Sullivan, D. F., (1971). A Single Index of Mortality and Morbidity. HSMHA Health Reports, 86(4), pp. 347–354. https://doi.org/10.2307/4594169.

Szukalski, P., (2018). Nadumieralność mężczyzn w Polsce w układzie regionalnym. Demografia i Gerontologia Społeczna – Biuletyn Informacyjny, (8).

UN, (2008a). Principles and Recommendations for Population and Housing Censuses Revision 2, New York: United Nations.

UN, (2008b). The measurement of Disability Recommendations for the 2010 Round of Censuses.

UN, (2015a). Principles and recommendations for population and housing censuses - Revision 3. In Statistical Papers Series M.No.67/Rev.3. New York: United Nations.

UN, (2015b). Przekształcamy nasz świat: Agenda na rzecz zrównoważonego rozwoju 2030, Retrieved from http://www.unic.un.org.pl/files/164/Agenda 2030_pl_2016_ostateczna.pdf.

UN WG, (2006). The Washington Group Short Set of Questions on Disability. Retrieved from http://www.washingtongroup-disability.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/The- Washington-Group-Short-Set-of-Questions-on-Disability.pdf.

US CENSUS BUREAU, (2017). Measuring Disability in a Census. Van Oyen, H., Bogaert, P., Yokota, R. T. C., & Berger, N., (2018). Measuring disability: A systematic review of the validity and reliability of the Global Activity Limitations Indicator (GALI). Archives of Public Health, 76(1), pp. 1–11, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-018-0270-8.

WBG, (2018). World Bank Group Announces New Commitments on Disability Inclusion.

WBG, (2018).World Bank Group Commitments on Disability-Inclusive Development.

WHO, (2002). Towards a Common Language for Functioning, Disability and Health ICF, Retrieved from https://www.who.int/classifications/icf/icfbeginnersguide.pdf.

WHO, & The World Bank, (2011). World report on disability 2011, 91, Retrieved from http://www.who.int/disabilities/world_report/2011/report.pdf.