The challenges of the population census round of 2020. Outline of the  methods of quality assessment of population census data

Jan Kordos

doi:https://doi.org/10.59170/stattrans-2017-006

The challenges of the population census round of 2020. Outline of the methods of quality assessment of population census data

Jan Kordos Warsaw Management University Statistics in Transition new series, vol. 18, 2017, 1, pages: 115-138 Published online: 1 March 2017 https://doi.org/10.59170/stattrans-2017-006

199 Views 14 Downloads

ARTICLE

(English) PDF

ABSTRACT

The author begins with the challenges of the population census round of 2020 and gives an outline of the methods of quality assessment of population census data. Next, the synthesis of two Eurostat documents (2007, 2009) and UN Statistics Division (2010) monograph relating to census data quality assessment are considered. Special attention is paid to three methods of census quality assessment: (i) demographic method, (ii) post-enumeration survey, and (iii) comparison with existing household surveys. Census quality assessment methods are discussed in the context of the international recommendations and experience of selected countries. Some Polish experience in these fields is also discussed, and some suggestions to the 2021 Polish Census of Population and Housing preparations are given

KEYWORDS

census of population, demographic analysis, quality assessment, post enumeration survey, household survey.

REFERENCES

BARTOSIŃSKA, D., (2006). Attempts at Applying Small Area Estimation Methods in Agricultural Sample Surveys in Poland, Statistics in Transition, Vol. 7, No. 6, December 2006, pp. 1203–1218.

DAUPHIN, M., CANAMUCIO, A., (1993). Design and implementation of post enumeration survey: developing country example. Washington: International Statistical Programs Center, US Bureau of the Census.

EUROSTAT, (2007). Handbook on Data Quality Assessment: Methods and Tools.

EUROSTAT, (2009). Handbook on Quality Reports.

GOŁATA, E., (2009). Economic activity in population census 2011 and administration resources. In: Gołata, E. (Ed.), Methods and Sources of Obtaining Information in Public Statistics, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Poznaniu. Poznań.

GOŁATA, E., (2010). Indirect Estimation of Economic Activity for the Register based Census. In: Gołata, E. (Ed.), Measurement and Information in Economy, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Poznaniu, Poznań, pp. 85–104 (in Polish).

GOŁATA, E., (2012). Population Census and Truth, Studia Demograficzne, No.1, 161, pp. 23–55 (in Polish).

GOŁATA, E., (2014). Census quality of the new generation, Wiadomości Statystyczne, No. 5, pp. 26–53. (in Polish).

GOŁATA, E., (2016). Shift in Methodology and Population Census Quality, Statistics in Transition-new series, December 2016, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 1–14.

HOGAN, H., (1992). The 1990 Post-Enumeration Survey: An Overview, The American Statistician, Vol. 46, No. 4, pp. 261–269.

HOGAN, H., (2003). The Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation: Theory and Design. Survey Methodology, 29 (2): 129–138.

HOGAN, H., WOLTER, K. (1988). Measuring Accuracy in a Post-Enumeration Survey, Survey Methodology, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 99–116.

KORDOS, J., (1987). Data Accuracy in Social Surveys (in Polish). BWS, GUS, t. 35, Warszawa.

KORDOS, J., (1988). Quality of Statistical Data (in Polish), PWE, Warsaw , pp. 244.

KORDOS, J., (2007). Some Aspects of Post-Enumeration Surveys in Poland, Statistics in Transition-new series, December 2007, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 563–576.

NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL, (2009). Coverage Measurement in the 2010 Census. Panel on Correlation Bias and Coverage Measurement in the 2010 Decennial Census, Robert M. Bell and Michael L. Cohen (Eds.). Committee on National Statistics, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press: http://www.nap.edu/catalog/12524/coverage-measurement-in-the-2010-census.

NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL, (2010). Envisioning the 2020 Census, 2010. http://www.nap.edu/catalog/12865/envisioning-the-2020-census.

NOWAK, L., (1998). Quality of Census Data, In: Tendencies of Changes in Structure of Population, Households and Families in 1998-1995 GUS, Warsaw, pp. 22–31 (in Polish).

NOWAK, L., (2008). The 2011 Census of Population and Housing –Methodology and Topics, the Committee of Demographic Research of the Polish Academy of Sciences (in Polish). http://www.knd.pan.pl/images/stories/pliki/pdf/Nowak_28_luty_2008.pdf

ONS, (2005). One Number Census: Evaluation Report, Census 2001 Review and Evaluation,http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/guide-method/census/census-2001/index.html.

PARADYSZ, J., (1989). On non-sampling errors in women’s fertility survey in the 1970 National Population Census. In: Problems of Statistical Surveys by Sampling. GUS, Warszawa, BWS, Vol. 36, pp. 154–159 (in Polish).

PARADYSZ, J., (2010). Necessity of Indirect Estimation in National Census. In: Gołata, E. (Ed.); Measurement and Information in Economy, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Poznaniu. Poznań, pp. 45 – 66 (in Polish).

STATISTICS CANADA, (2009), Quality Guidelines, Fifth Edition –October 2009; http://unstats.un.org/unsd/dnss/docs-nqaf/Canada-12-539-x2009001-eng.pdf.

STATISTICS FINLAND, (2004). Use of Registers and Administrative Data Sources for Statistical Purposes. Best Practices of Statistics Finland, Tilastokeskus, Statistikcentralen, Statistics Finland, Helsinki.

SZABLOWSKI, J., WESOLOWSKI, J., WIECZORKOWSKI, R., (1996). Index of Fitting as a Measure of Data Quality — on basis of the Post-enumeration Survey of Micro-census 1995, Wiadomości Statystyczne, No. 4. pp. 43–49 (in Polish).

UN, (2007). UN Principles and Recommendations for Population and Housing Censuses: http://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic/sources/census/docs/P&R2_February %2012%202007.pdf

UN, (2010). Post Enumeration Surveys Operational Guidelines. Technical Report. United Nations Statistics Division New York.Available at: http://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic/standmeth/handbooks/.

UN, Economic Commission for Europe, (2011). Using Administrative and Secondary Sources for Official Statistic, A Handbook of Principles and Practices, New York and Geneva.

http://www.bing.com/search?ei=UTF&pc=AV01&q=UN+Economic+Commission+for+Europe+%282011%29+%2CUsing+Administrative+and+Secondary+Sources+for+Official+Statistic%2C+A+Handbook+of+Principles+and+Practices%2C+New+York+and+Geneva.+&FROM=AVASDF.

UN, Economic Commission for Europe, (2015). Recommendations for the 2020 Censuses of Population and Housing, New York, Geneva. http://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic/sources/census/census3.htm.

WHITFORD, D. C., BANDA, J., (2001). Post-enumeration Surveys: are they worth it? Symposium on Global Review of 2000 Round of Population and Housing Censuses: Mid-Decade Assessment and Future Prospects, UN Statistics Division, New York, 7-10 August 2001.

WOLTMAN, H., ALBERTTI, N., MORIARITY, C., (1988). Sample Design for the 1990 Census Post-Enumeration Survey, Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section, American Statistical Association, pp. 529–533.

ZASEPA, R., (1993). Use of Sampling Methods in Population Censuses in Poland, Statistics in Transition, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 69–78.

ZHANG, L.-C, (2011). A Unit-Error Theory for Register-Based Household Statistics, „Journal of Official Statistics”, 27 (3), pp. 415–432