Models for survey nonresponse and bias adjustment techniques

H.  Öztaş Ayhan

doi:https://doi.org/10.59170/stattrans-2023-040

Models for survey nonresponse and bias adjustment techniques

H. Öztaş Ayhan Professor Emeritus, Department of Statistics, METU, Ankara, Turkey ORCID:https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3818-483X Statistics in Transition new series, vol. 24, 2023, 3, pages: 139-150 Published online: 13 June 2023 https://doi.org/10.59170/stattrans-2023-040 Citation: Ayhan, H. Ö., 2023. Models for survey nonresponse and bias adjustment techniques. Statistics in Transition new series, 24(3), pp. 139-150. https://doi.org/10.59170/stattrans-2023-040

543 Views 49 Downloads

ARTICLE

(English) PDF

ABSTRACT

Survey statisticians have been dealing with the issues of nonresponse in sample surveys for many years. Due to the complex nature of the mechanism, so far it has not been easy to find a general solution to this problem. In this paper, several aspects of this topic will be elaborated on: the survey unit nonresponse bias has been examined alternatively by taking response amounts which are fixed initially and also by taking the response amounts as random variables. An overview of the components of the bias due to nonresponse will be performed. Nonresponse bias components are illustrated for each alternative approach and the amount of bias was computed for each case.

KEYWORDS

response rate, nonresponse bias, nonresponse rate, sample survey, survey error.

REFERENCES

Ayhan, H. Ö., (1981). Sources of Nonresponse Bias in 1978 Turkish Fertility Survey. Turkish Journal of Population Studies, 2–3, pp. 104-148.

Ayhan, H. Ö., (1991). Post Stratification and Weighting in Sample Surveys. Research Symposium '91. State Institute of Statistics, Ankara, 11 pp.

Ayhan, H. Ö., (2003). Combined Weighting Procedures for Post–Survey Adjustment in Complex Sample Surveys. Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute, 60(1), pp. 53-54.

Ayhan, H. Ö., (2017). Effect of Nonresponse and Callbacks on the Estimation of Survey Nonresponse Bias. Turkish Journal of Population Studies, 39, pp. 91-107.

Bethlehem, J. G., Kersten, H. M. P., (1985). On the Treatment of Nonresponse in Sample Surveys. Journal of Official Statistics, 1(3), pp. 287-300.

Bethlehem, J. G., Keller, W. J., (1987). Linear Weighting of Sample Survey Data. Journal of Official Statistics, 3(2), pp. 141-154.

Bethlehem, J. G., (2002). Weighting Nonresponse Adjustments Based on Auxiliary Information. In: Groves, R. M., Dillman, D. A., Eltinge, J. L. & Little, R. J. A. (Eds), Survey Nonresponse. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Bethlehem, J. G., (2009). Applied Survey Methods: A Statistical Perspective. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

Groves, R. M., Couper, M. P., (1998). Nonresponse in Household Interview Surveys. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Groves, R. M., D. A. Dillman, J. L. Eltinge and R. J. A. Little, Eds., (2002). Survey Nonresponse. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Keser, I. K., (2011). The History of Survey Sampling. TurkStat, Journal of Statistical Research, 8(3), pp. 54-74.

Kish, L., (1995). Survey Sampling. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Lindström, H., (1983). Non-Response Errors in Sample Surveys. Statistics Sweden, Urval Number 16, 94 pp.

Lindström, H., J. Wretman, G. Forsman, and Cassel, C., (1979). Standard Methods for Non-Response Treatment in Statistical Estimation. National Central Bureau of Statistics, Sweden, 60 pp.

Moser, C. A., Kalton, G., (1979). Survey Methods in Social Investigation. London: Heinemann Educational Books.

Tiku, M. L,. (1964). A Note on the Negative Moments of a Truncated Poisson Variate. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 59, pp. 1220-1224.

Verma, V. K., (1991). Sampling Methods. United Nations, Statistical Institute for Asia and the Pacific, Manual for Statistical Trainers, Number 2. Tokyo, Japan.