© Leonardo Campanelli. Article available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 licence
ARTICLE
ABSTRACT
We analyze, for the first time, the first-digit distribution of the monkeypox daily cases in the United States of America, from May 17 to September 21, 2022. The overall data follow Benford’s law, a conclusion substantiated by eight different statistical tests, including the “Euclidean distance test”, which has been designed to specifically check Benford’s distribution in data. This result aligns with those of other infectious diseases, such as COVID 19, whose Benfordness has already been confirmed in the literature. Daily counts of monkeypox cases, like any other disease evolve in time. For this reason, we analyzed the temporal deviation of monkeypox counts from Benford’s law to check for possible anomalies in the temporal series of cases. The dynamic analysis was performed by means of the Euclidean distance test. This is because, to our best knowledge, that is the only statistically valid, Benford-specific test whose underlying estimator has a cumulative distribution function with known analytical properties, and is applicable to small and large samples. This is the case in dynamic analyses, where the number of data points usually starts from small values and then increases in time. No anomalies were detected, which indicates that no (fraudulent) alterations or errors in data gathering took place.
KEYWORDS
Benford’s law, monkeypox, Euclidean distance statistic, dynamic analysis
REFERENCES
Benford, F., (1938). The Law of Anomalous Numbers. Proceedings of the American Physical Society, 78, pp. 551–572.
Berger A., Hill, T., Rogers, E., (2009). Benford online bibliography. https://www.benford online.net/ (accessed on 2023-09-29).
Campanelli, L., (2022a). Breaking Benford’s law: A statistical analysis of Covid-19 data using the Euclidean distance statistic. Statistics in Transition new series, 24(2), pp. 201–215.
Campanelli, L., (2022b). A Statistical Cryptanalysis of the Beale Ciphers. Cryptologia, 47(5), pp. 466–473.
Campanelli, L., (2022c). On the Euclidean Distance Statistic of Benford’s Law. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods. DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2022.2082480.
Campanelli, L., (2022d). Testing Benford’s Law: from small to very large data sets. Spanish Journal of Statistics, 4, pp. 41–54.
CDC, (2022). U.S. Monkeypox Case Trends Reported to CDC. https://www.cdc.gov/poxvirus/monkeypox/response/2022/ (accessed on 2022-09-24).
Cho, W. K. T., Gaines, B. J., (2007). Breaking the (Benford) Law: Statistical Fraud Detection in Campaign Finance. Am. Stat., 61, pp. 218–223.
Farhadi, N., (2021). Can we rely on COVID-19 data? An assessment of data from over 200 countries worldwide. Sci. Prog. ,104, pp. 1–19.
Giles, D. E., (2013). Exact asymptotic goodness-of-fit testing for discrete circular data, with applications. Chilean Journal of Statistics, 4(1), pp. 19–34.
Goodman, W., (2016). The promises and pitfalls of Benford’s law. Significance, 13, pp. 38–41.
Hill, T. P., (1995a). The significant-digit phenomenon. Am. Math. Mon., 102, pp. 322 -327.
Hill, T. P., (1995b). Base-invariance implies Benford’s law. Proc. Am. Math. Soc., 123, pp. 887–895.
Hill, T. P., (1995c). A statistical derivation of the significant-digit law. Stat. Sci., 10, pp. 354–363.
Lockhart, R. A., Spinelli, J. J., Stephens, M. A., (2007). Cramér–von Mises statistics for discrete distributions with unknown parameters. The Canadian Journal of Statistics, 35, 1, pp. 125–133.
Kolmogorov, A., (1933). Sulla determinazione empirica di una legge di distribuzione. G. Ist. Ital. Attuari, 4, pp. 83–91.
Kuiper, N. H., (1960). Tests concerning random points on a circle. Proc. Koninkl. Nederl. Akad. Van Wettenschappen, A63, pp. 38–47.
Miller, S. J. (ed.), (2015). Benford’s Law: Theory and Applications, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Leemis, L. M., Schmeiser, B. W., Evans, D. L., (2000). Survival Distributions Satisfying Benford’s Law. Am. Stat., 54, pp. 236–241.
Lesperance, M., Reed, J.W., Stephens, M. A., Tsao, C.,Wilton, B., (2016). Assessing Conformance with Benford’s Law: Goodness-Of-Fit Tests and Simultaneous Confidence Intervals. PLos ONE 11(3): e0151235. DOI:10.137/journal.pone.0151235.
Morrow, J., (2014). Benford’s Law, Families of Distributions and a Test Basis. Centre for Economic Performance. London.
Nigrini, M. J., (1996). A taxpayer compliance application of Benford’s law. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 18, pp. 72–91.
Nigrini, M. J., (2012). Benford’s Law. Applications for Forensic Accounting, Auditing, and Fraud Detection, Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Pérez-González, F., Abdallah, C. T., Heileman, G. L., (2007). Benford’s Law in Image Processing. IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, pp. 405–408.
Roukema, B. F., (2013). A first-digit anomaly in the 2009 Iranian presidential election. J. Appl. Stat., 41(1), pp. 164–199.
Sambridge, M., Jackson, A., (2020). National COVID numbers - Benford’s law looks for errors. Nature, 581, p. 384.
Sambridge, M., Tkalˇci´c, H., Jackson, A., (2010). Benford’s law in the natural sciences. Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L22301.
Stephens, M. A., (1970). Use of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Cramér–von Mises and Related Statistics Without Extensive Tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 32, pp. 115–122.
Wase, V., (2021). Benford’s law in the Beale ciphers. Cryptologia, 45(3), pp. 282–286.
WHO, (2022). https://www.who.int/emergencies/situations/monkeypox-outbreak-2022 (accessed on 2022-09-24).